Is that a rhetorical question?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > "Tom Walker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I said nothing whatsoever about economic "progress." I specifically > challenged the meaningfulness of the > > notion of economic "growth". Economic *progress,* by contrast, would > require discarding the obsolete > > and discredited terminology from the mid-1950s. > > How do you define economic progress? And how was terminology from the > Mid-1950s discredited? > Are you throwing Marx out with the bathwater? > > -- > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
