"Postmodernism doesn't seem to be a good approach to discuss economic issues because of it's rejection of reason and science."
A little ragged for a zen koan but nice try. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > "Tom Walker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "Critiques of Growth in Classical Political Economy: Mill's Stationary > State and a > Marxian Response," Gareth Dale, *New Political Economy*, 2013, Vol. 18, > No. 3, 431-457, > > Postmodernism doesn't seem to be a good approach to discuss economic > issues because > of it's rejection of reason and science. > > Does your approach advocate democratic control of the economy? > > -- > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
