You wrote: "Until we build a party that is as committed to the abolition of private property as the Republicans were committed to the abolition of slavery in the 1860s, we will remain mired in war, racism, economic misery, environmental despoliation and all the rest."
"War" was on your list. That's why I brought up the Iran nuclear deal. Are you taking "war" off your list now? What if, in the next four years, we can't stop all wars, but we could stop some wars. Would that be worth caring about? Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] (202) 448-2898 x1 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/23/15 11:37 AM, Robert Naiman wrote: > > So, the Iran nuclear deal that's happening now - in your worldview, > > that's totally irrelevant, whether that happens or not, that's like > > choosing Pepsi instead of Coke, correct? No meaningful difference? > > I am sorry but I don't see what this has to do with wage stagnation in > the USA, the failure to enact a single-payer health plan, infrastructure > decay, nativism, racism, climate change, flora and fauna extinction, and > all the other ills we associate with capitalism in its decline. When > Obama ran for office in 2008, he created the same kind of excitement > that Sanders is creating today. What we got was George W. Bush's 3rd > term. It is a shell game basically. Sanders will not be the DP candidate > in 2016. He will endorse Clinton who will run against Bush in all > likelihood. Given the frustration that people have with their economic > situation, I would not be surprised if Bush is the next president. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
