Actually, the opposite is more likely to be true - the White House rapprochement with Iran will almost certainly lead to fewer Syrians being killed, because there's growing momentum for a US-Russia-Iran deal to end the anti-Assad part of the war. So there will actually be less war, as a result of what the Democrats are doing, then you seem to want - you want the war to continue until Assad is toppled, but Democrats increasingly want to end the anti-Assad part of the war.
Congress rethinks anti-Assad stance http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/09/congress-democrats-assad-regime-change-isis.html Kerry's remarks on Syria trouble Turkey http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/09/turkey-usa-syria-ankara-angered-kerry-remarks.html Back International Talks to End Syrian Civil War http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/back-international-talks?source=c.em&r_by=1135580 Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] (202) 448-2898 x1 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately, the White House rapprochement with Iran will almost > certainly lead to the deaths of many more Syrians since it gives the > Russians and the Iranians a free hand. > > On 9/23/15 11:57 AM, Robert Naiman wrote: > > > > "War" was on your list. That's why I brought up the Iran nuclear deal. > > Are you taking "war" off your list now? > > > > What if, in the next four years, we can't stop all wars, but we could > > stop some wars. Would that be worth caring about? > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
