Leigh:
> > Here's one way of looking at it:
> > Every time a tree falls... the GNP goes up
> > Every time a cancer patient is diagnosed... the GNP goes up.
> > Every pandemic... Every war... the GNP goes up.
> > There's fraud in there somewhere.

Walt:
> Not really. GNP is just a measure of the value of goods and services
> produced in a year. Wooden objects, cancer drugs, and bombs count as goods
> and services. The GNP isn't a perfect measure by any means. But blaming it
> for not measuring what it is not supposed to is not reasonable. In fact,
> its another side of the same coin of those who think the GDP  measures
> progress, rather than a small pat of it.

It helps to go back to Marx (and other classical economists) on this
one. GDP is a measure of exchange-value (though not in labor terms),
the price of all final goods and services sold through the market
during a given year (along with some market-prices that are
calculated, such as the value of the services provided by
owner-occupied homes). It's essentially a measure of market activity.

On the other hand, measures such as the "Genuine Progress Indicator"
(GPI) are an effort to measure the use-value produced by an economy.
Alas, it's damned hard to measure this. What is the use-value of
leisure time, for example? and how can we add it to the (negative)
use-value of pollution? The Redefining Progress folks -- who calculate
the GPI -- use pretty neoclassical assumptions. The wage is used to
value leisure time, for example.

Further, though use-value is most important from an ethical and
humanist perspective, capitalism doesn't follow ethical or humanist
guidelines. Instead, it follows a much more market-oriented
perspective. And if the capitalists aren't happy (following market
measures of profitability), they cut back on accumulation, which leads
to a fall in employment. So our livelihoods and our ability to attain
use-values depends crucially on market-oriented measures.
--
Jim Devine
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let
people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

Reply via email to