We have no way of saying how much of capitalist accumulation is due to the 
primitive
accumulation that occurred around the globe.  Certainly it is important, but 
other
societies dispossess peoples and never developed full-blown capitalism.  Marx 
put
primitive accumulation in the back of volume 1 because he wanted to emphasize 
that
the crux of capitalism was the "fair" exploitation by way of markets.
This is not to deny the importance of primitive accumulation.  Slaves stolen 
from
Africa and put to work growing cotton were the mainstay of the British economy 
and
the source of much of Marx's support from Engels, yet Marx emphasized the role 
of the
workers in the British textile industry.  Unlike Engels, he did not pay much
attention to the fact that many of the workers came because of dispossession in
Ireland.

-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 
95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com

Reply via email to