You quoted me out of context. I agree with what you say about NLP and computational linguistics. My point about KM (Knowledge Management) was that most products in this area use very little of this.
Anyway, thanks for agreeing that keeping "AI" is perhaps the most appropriate name for the namespace. Hopefully helpfully yours, Steve -- Steven Tolkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 617-563-0516 Fidelity Investments 82 Devonshire St. V8D Boston MA 02109 There is nothing so practical as a good theory. Comments are by me, not Fidelity Investments, its subsidiaries or affiliates. > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Blaheta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: An ML:: namespace? > > > Quoth Tolkin, Steve: > > statistical natural language processing (This is not a > mainstream part > > of linguistics for many years, because it does not pay any attention > > to even grammar. Rather it is IR (information retrieval) > informed by > > AI, statistic, data mining, etc. > > I have to disagree. NLP (which is pretty much all statistical at this > point in time) is quite a bit more than what you say. Also known as > "computational linguistics", it covers nearly anything you can do with > natural languages and computers. In particular, tagging and > parsing are > common tasks (and you better believe parsing pays attention > to grammar! :). > Other subfields include machine translation, voice > recognition, dialogue > processing, anaphor resolution, prosody analysis... the list goes on. > Language modelling is one important thing that NLP/CL does, > and that's a > very linguistic thing: as our (computer) language models improve, we > gain insight into the models floating around in our brains. > > Anyway, that's mostly tangential. Apropos the real topic of > discussion, > I'd just like to point out that despite all the stupid bs and hype in > the popular media, most AI researchers still call themselves AI > researchers. If they adopted some other name, the media > would just get > hold of that and do the same thing. Meanwhile, AI *does* have the > advantage of being very recognisable, and in particular, *the thing > people would think of* if that's what they were looking for. > It's even > recognisable in acronym form. > > -- > -=-Don > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=-=-<http://www.cs.brown.edu/~dpb/>-=- > "In AI, much of the I is in the beholder." --Manning & Schütze >
