> You quoted me out of context. I agree with what you say > about NLP and computational linguistics. > My point about KM (Knowledge Management) was that > most products in this area use very little of this.
I left my opinion unclear, and I'm just realizing it after reading this morning's batch of posts. I didn't mean to suggest AI:: go away. I meant for KM:: (or whatever - your pet name here) to be an additional category parallel to it, for libs that the authors feel don't quite fit into AI for one reason or another. I get the vibe that this still would not be popular, though. Just a thought. > Anyway, thanks for agreeing that keeping "AI" is perhaps > the most appropriate name for the namespace. There does seem to be a consensus for this. I suppose if It Ain't Broke... ________________________________________ matt youell http://www.youell.com/matt/ "It's hard to get people to drink the Kool-Aid."
