Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads

[Gurusamy Sarathy]

On Thu, 03 May 2001 10:39:23 PDT, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>to solve, STORE would need to make sure the value is already solar tied or
>take care to tie it, so that access to references such as $h->{two} are
>also serialized.  if %$h contains values which are references, they
>must also be solar, which means walking the entire value structure
>for each STORE.  ugh.

If and only if the value being stored is not already solar.  I don't
think that's too bad.

>then of course there's more problems with certain structures, such as CV,
>which cannot share padlists across interpreters without duping the CV or
>pp_entersub becoming aware and locking the CV.

I don't see a _need_ for solar CVs, given that the optrees are already
shared, thanks to them being readonly.


Sarathy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]