On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote: > Then this is a bug in bleadperls implmentation of :shared GVs? i don't consider it a bug. data that might be "upgraded" at runtime should never have been marked as shared in the first place.
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads nick
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
