01-05-04 17.01, skrev Doug MacEachern p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande: > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote: > >> Then this is a bug in bleadperls implmentation of :shared GVs? > > i don't consider it a bug. data that might be "upgraded" at runtime > should never have been marked as shared in the first place. > > > use : shared POSIX; can't POSIX contain values that can be stringified or upgraded? Artur
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads nick
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
