01-05-04 17.01, skrev Doug MacEachern p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande:

> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote:
> 
>> Then this is a bug in bleadperls implmentation of :shared GVs?
> 
> i don't consider it a bug.  data that might be "upgraded" at runtime
> should never have been marked as shared in the first place.
> 
> 
> 


use : shared POSIX;
can't POSIX contain values that can be stringified or upgraded?

Artur

Reply via email to