Chris Stith wrote: > Memoization and iteration are fairly high-level details. IMHO, > they shouldn't be in system libraries. They may be there, but > it wouldn't take long to figure out which library functions do > this if you were to start trying to use them in a threaded > program. The world is not perfect. As long as there are issues > with libraries you use, there will be issues with your code > as well. All we can do, short of replacing all the libraries, > is to minimize the damage. You need to consider libraries other than the system ones, for example those wrapped by XSUB modules. Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Andy Dougherty
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
