Christopher H. Laco wrote: > Chris Dolan wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: >> >>> metayml_conforms_spec currently very much busts the CPANTS game. I'm >>> checking if the files comply to META.yml spec 1.2. Most don't, because >>> they seem to use 1.0 >>> Should I switch to 1.0-checking? >> No. The CPANTS game is a tool for change. We might as well encourage >> people to change to the current spec. >> >> Chris >> >> --Chris Dolan, Software Developer, Clotho Advanced Media Inc. >> 608-294-7900, fax 294-7025, 1435 E Main St, Madison WI 53703 >> vCard: http://www.chrisdolan.net/ChrisDolan.vcf >> >> Clotho Advanced Media, Inc. - Creators of MediaLandscape Software >> (http://www.media-landscape.com/) and partners in the revolutionary >> Croquet project (http://www.opencroquet.org/) >> >> >> > > I'm ok with "has the latest and greatest 1.2 META spec" being a metric, > but I think it should be one of the "above 100.00 bonus points" metrics > like the has_demo metric. > > and yes, I'm biased. I was #2. :-) > > -=Chris >
I'm not sure why, but about every other post I make isn't showing up on the list... hmm.... -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
