On Tuesday 18 December 2007 17:49:16 Andy Armstrong wrote: > Sure - but I'd have expected that to be perceived as a specific > problem in an otherwise valuable system. It's not a rational reason to > right off automated testing as a whole surely?
That depends on the ratio of useless to useful results. > And I have to say being admonished by an auto-responder always stirs > my piss a bit :) Agreed, if that means on your side of the pond what I think it means on this side of the pond. -- c
