Re: question about branching/returning

[Simon Cozens]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:32:18PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> Ok, that was pretty much what I thought.  But then what is the 'end'
> opcode for?  It does a 'RETURN 0', which would increment the PC by 0
> opcodes...which either counts as an infinite loop or a no-op, and we've
> already got a no-op op.

end *ought* to break the loop. Whoever rewrote the op loop to keep going
until the end of the bytecode stream didn't think of that. :)

-- 
Um. There is no David conspiracy. Definitely not. No Kate conspiracy either.
No. No, there is definitely not any sort of David conspiracy, and we are
definitely *not* in league with the Kate conspiracy. Who doesn't exist. And
nor does the David conspiracy. No. No conspiracies here. - Thorfinn, ASR