Well, I'm in the process of fiddling with this stuff anyway...what do you
want me to make it do?
Dave
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:32:18PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> > Ok, that was pretty much what I thought. But then what is the 'end'
> > opcode for? It does a 'RETURN 0', which would increment the PC by 0
> > opcodes...which either counts as an infinite loop or a no-op, and we've
> > already got a no-op op.
>
> end *ought* to break the loop. Whoever rewrote the op loop to keep going
> until the end of the bytecode stream didn't think of that. :)
>
> --
> Um. There is no David conspiracy. Definitely not. No Kate conspiracy either.
> No. No, there is definitely not any sort of David conspiracy, and we are
> definitely *not* in league with the Kate conspiracy. Who doesn't exist. And
> nor does the David conspiracy. No. No conspiracies here. - Thorfinn, ASR
>
