On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote: > Dan Sugalski: > # > (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?) > # > # Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that? > > Presumably, "Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if > need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing function > call system, something we chose not to do."
Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little
Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.
Dan
