Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm probably going to get shot for suggesting this, but if each interpreter
> has a count of the number of full continuations invoked (ie non-return
> continuations), then I think that we can know when we *haven't*.

Nobody gets shot - and - interesting idea, but

> * If they differ, branch to slow case fixup code.

Smells like duplicating the whole sub, which would make Evil Sub just
more Evil.

> Hmmm. But we still have to save all values out from registers before a call.
> Pah. May not be a great win.

Yep.

> Nicholas Clark

leo

Reply via email to