Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why

[Michael Mathews]

Steve Simmons explained
> >
> > IMHO someone should write an RFC on why perl6 should NOT have
> > comments.  The RFC editor doesn't have time to follow these zillions
> > of discussions and write documents based on them.
>
> Ooog, horrible phrasing on my part.  That should read ``the editor
> of the RFC which is rejected.''  Sorry....

This brings up a very important question (especially since you used my RFC
as an example), which is: how shall we know when a particular RFC is
rejected? My understanding was we should generate RFC's. I don't know if (or
particularly how) we should be rejecting them before they are fully
released.

--Michael