Jonathan Scott Duff said
> BTW, I propose that RFCs have a Status: field as part of the VERSION.
> Here are some possible values that I can see:
> Status: accepted # we all agree that it should go in
> Status: rejected # we all agree that it shouldn't go in
> Status: tabled # shelved, put away for now
okay, but I think my question still stands: how shall I, as an RFC
Maintainer (or is that someone else?) determine what that status is? Shall
we all vote? Who shall vote? Shall I decide based on who wrote the most
passionate response (make it an essay contest)??
Personally I don't want anything to do with judging the "status" of this
RFC, beyond my one voice. I do accept responsibility for compiling some
organized record of the responses I've received, but who shall decide
(before Larry decides)?
--Michael
