Michael Mathews wrote:
> how shall I, as an RFC > Maintainer determine what that status is?
> 
> Personally I don't want anything to do with judging the "status" of this
> RFC, beyond my one voice. I do accept responsibility for compiling some
> organized record of the responses I've received, but who shall decide
> (before Larry decides)?

You have to determine the status, but that shouldn't be scary,
considering these RFCs are ultimately just recommendations for
Larry's consideration.  Since the broad concensus seems to have
been that inline comments might be very useful, and not breaking
anything else, the status could be "Good". 

On this particular RFC, you probably want to summarize all the
alternatives suggested, along with the pros and cons of each.

You can ignore the ideas that no one seemed to like (if any).

-- 
John Porter

Reply via email to