On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:09:51PM -0400, Ted Ashton wrote: > Better yet, DWIM. If I write > > print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > > and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as > it stands. Some time ago, this is how it was done, to stay backwards compatible. In recent versions (the farthest I can tell is 5.004) it became a fatal error. I don't think we should go backwards. If someone uses @, they mean array. A warning should be emitted, but it should print a blank string. Michael -- Administrator www.shoebox.net Programmer, System Administrator www.gallanttech.com --
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In stri... John Porter
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In stri... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In stri... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In string @ ... Mark-Jason Dominus