On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:54:33PM -0500, John Porter wrote: > Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > I rather like the idea that contract names are themselves namespace > > > > I rather dislike it: I think we are trying to stuff to much information > > on the package namespaces. > > Well, I didn't say *package* namespace; I'm just pointing out that > contract names can probably use the same kind of hierarchical > categorization that other names do. Ahh, okay. > > > luck"? No thanks, that's exactly the same mess we are now with the > > package names. > > When you come up with a solution to this problem, please send an > email to ICANN. I'm not claiming to have solution: I claim that the com.sun.java.Gorkulator isn't one. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules James Mastros
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Damian Conway
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules James Mastros
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- RE: Really auto autoloaded modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules James Mastros
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Simon Cozens
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dave Rolsky
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Damian Conway
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Austin Hastings
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Damian Conway
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger