>>>>> "John" == John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> No special name, huh? Maybe that's the way it ought to be. That's the way I feel occasionally about the Schwartzian Transform, actually. Having to explain that it was named *for* me but not *by* me (in fact, actually to spite me, if I recall). Although it is fun when we get to the "Schwartizian Transform Illustrated" page in my slideset... I get to say "don't wait for the swimsuit issue... it's not a very pretty sight". -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Johan Vromans
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Edward Peschko
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Adam Turoff
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Bart Lateur
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Zenon Zabinski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Brent Dax
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Brian
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz