On Wednesday 25 April 2001 21:37, Edward Peschko wrote: > > '.' is already, to some extent, space sensitive anyway, because it > > has to pull double duty as a decimal point, as well. > > > > '4.5' (4.5) vs '4 .5' (45) vs '4. 5' (missing operator) > > beautiful. Then extending this is simple, consistent, easy to read, > compatible with perl5.. I'm not sure that that was the point I was trying to make. If nothing else, the '.' would then be responsible for *three* different actions. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Nathan Torkington
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Paul Johnson
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Buddha Buck
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Casey West
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dan Sugalski