On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 03:33:52PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > Please, no. Some of us have to *teach* this language. > Then I guess that either space sensitive '.' is the answer Sorry. I'll try it again. SPACE SENSITIVE and SOME OF US HAVE TO TEACH IT. Do you understand yet? Are you *really* willing to deal with hundreds of newbies who don't understand why $a . $b isn't the same as $a .$b and isn't the same as $a. $b and isn't the same as $a.$b? And do you realise what the only "good" answer we can possibly give them is? "Because Ed said so". Sorry, I'm not going to do that. -- I'm surrounded by electromagnetic radiation all the time. There are radio stations broadcasting at lots of kW, other people using phones, the police, [...] the X-rays coming from my monitor, and God help us, the sun. I figure I have better things to worry about than getting cancer from the three or four minutes a day I spend on my cell phone. - Dave Brown.
- Dot can DWIM without whitespace Brent Dax
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dave
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Nathan Torkington
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Paul Johnson
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Buddha Buck
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Casey West
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dan Sugalski