Edward Peschko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > beautiful. Then extending this is simple, consistent, easy to read,
> > > compatible with perl5..
> >
> > I'm not sure that that was the point I was trying to make.
> > If nothing else, the '.' would then be responsible for *three*
> > different actions.
>
> Right, but what *I* am saying is that any given user is already conditioned to
> the fact that it can mean different things in different circumstances.
>
> And like I said earlier, if we make $a . $b the only proper form for
> concatenation, I don't think that there is going to be much of a learning curve.
> In any case, I like it better than yet another punctuation mark.
I see, and you would be willing to break the cases where I may want to
put spaces around the . used for method invocations for clarity?
{
....
$foo . foobar ("Test1");
$foobar . baz ("Test2");
$tmtowdi . quux ("Test3");
....
}
That specific use of whitespace I don't do often, but I could see
doing it. I often do something like that when working with other
variable length identifiers.
>
> Ed