At 04:30 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Well, I was thinking that generally the site policy would be expressed
> in a
> > single file
>
>This smells strangely familiar. Alot like the .perlrc discussion that
>was had back many moons ago. The havoc a general syntax-altering
>policy file could wreck would be enourmous.
>
>To use a Perl 5 example, consider the simple setting of "use strict"
>as a general site policy. Basicaly, most of the Perl code in your
>/usr/bin will explode when you try to run it.
Right, that's why the policy stuff we're discussing is optional... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
