At 05:37 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:44:24AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 04:30 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > >To use a Perl 5 example, consider the simple setting of "use strict"
> > >as a general site policy. Basicaly, most of the Perl code in your
> > >/usr/bin will explode when you try to run it.
> >
> > Right, that's why the policy stuff we're discussing is optional... :)
>
>Ugg, we're definately rehashing the .perlrc discussion now. :(
>
>By "optional" I take it you mean an admin can choose to define their
>own site policy or not?
No. Optional in that you have to do a "use SomePolicyThingWeHaventDecided;"
to put it in force.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
