It's certainly a mistake to say "the goals of .NET", as if they were a monolithic whole. But the point is, some of the (technical) goals of .NET are worthy, if not the slightest bit original; and so it should not be a shame if some of Perl6's goals were collinear with them. And I hope that ends this thread. -- John Porter It's so mysterious, the land of tears.
- .NET David Grove
- Re: .NET Larry Wall
- Re: .NET John Porter
- Re: .NET Dan Sugalski
- Re: .NET John Porter
- Re: .NET Uri Guttman
- Re: Serialization Austin Hastings
- Re: .NET Ilya Martynov
- Re: .NET Dan Sugalski
- Re: .NET David Grove
- Re: .NET John Porter
- Re: .NET Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: .NET Michael G Schwern
- RE: .NET David Grove
- Re: .NET Dan Brian
- Re: .NET Dave Storrs
- Re: .NET Ilya Martynov
- Re: .NET Dave Storrs
- Re: .NET John Barnette