frederic fabbro wrote:
I'm not even sure how that would parse, though that:
>
@keep <~ grep /good/ <~ @list ~> grep /bad!/ ~> @throw;
>
would go like:
>
( @keep <~ grep /good/ <~ @list ) ~> grep /bad!/ ~> @throw;
Correct, if <~ is indeed slightly higher precedence than ~>
which is probably not what i wanted...
True. The presence of both operators in an expression probably ought to trigger a (silenceable) warning. Damian
