On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:41:23AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: Juerd informed me today that .method should still means $_.method.
: However, for the OO modules we're writing, there still needs to be a way
: to invoke methods on the current invocant, when the invocant name has
: been omitted from the method() declaration.
: Currently Pugs has:
: Is any of the two forms considered canonical? Or is there some other
At the moment $?SELF is the only canonical form, though the invocant
is also in $_ at least until it's rebound. Any other forms will
probably involve a pragma or macro, since there is no consensus on