On 5/14/05, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mean to be disrespectful, but what was whoever suggested ^
> thinking?
Well I suggested backtick in the same role *duck*.
> For starters, about the only combination harder to hit with on
> spanned hand might be ctrl-F5.
I've remapped my keyboard so that I push shift for numbers and leave
it off for the various symbols on the top row. ^ isn't hard to type
for me. (Plus, is it that hard to use two hands with shifted keys
like you were taught in typing class?)
> ... the rest of Adam's rant
You know, rants usually just make me wrap a pillow around my head,
push delete, and read the next message. But for some reason this one
stuck out at me. If the alternatives are:
* declare $self, use $self.method, and .method for calling on $_
* use .method, and use $_.method for calling on $_
I'd say the former has no case. Not by popular demand, not by any
Huffman principle, not by the principle of least surprise.
Luke