On 5/14/05, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't mean to be disrespectful, but what was whoever suggested ^ > thinking?
Well I suggested backtick in the same role *duck*. > For starters, about the only combination harder to hit with on > spanned hand might be ctrl-F5. I've remapped my keyboard so that I push shift for numbers and leave it off for the various symbols on the top row. ^ isn't hard to type for me. (Plus, is it that hard to use two hands with shifted keys like you were taught in typing class?) > ... the rest of Adam's rant You know, rants usually just make me wrap a pillow around my head, push delete, and read the next message. But for some reason this one stuck out at me. If the alternatives are: * declare $self, use $self.method, and .method for calling on $_ * use .method, and use $_.method for calling on $_ I'd say the former has no case. Not by popular demand, not by any Huffman principle, not by the principle of least surprise. Luke