On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jon Lang<datawea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>> for the latest spec changes regarding this item, see
>> http://perlcabal.org/svn/pugs/revision/?rev=27959.
>>
>> is everyone equally miserable now? ;)
>
> Already seen it.  My latest points still stand, though: #`(...) is
> still vulnerable to ambiguity relative to #..., whereas `#(...),
> `#...#`, or (#...) don't share the same vulnerability.

With the latest S26 proposal (and its new declarator blocks) in mind,
I think that I would be happiest if embedded comments used the (#...)
syntax.  Reason: you still get the flexibility of choosing your own
delimiters (unlike `#...#`), and you don't have to worry about where
the = goes (unlike #`(...): is it #=`(...), #=(...), or #`(=...)?
Likewise for `#(...)).

-- 
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang

Reply via email to