Darren Duncan wrote:
Dave Whipp wrote:
Similarly (0..1).Seq should most likely return Real numbers
No it shouldn't, because the endpoints are integers.
If you want Real numbers, then say "0.0 .. 1.0" instead.
-- Darren Duncan
That would be inconsistent. $x ~~ 0..1 means 0 <= $x <= 1. The fact that
the endpoints are integers does not imply the the range does not include
My argument is that iterating a range could be defined to give you a
uniform distribution of values that would smart match true against that
range -- and that such a definition would be just as reasonable as (and
perhaps more general than) one that says that you get an incrementing
ordered set of integers across that range.