Darren Duncan wrote:

Dave Whipp wrote:Similarly (0..1).Seq should most likely return Real numbers## Advertising

No it shouldn't, because the endpoints are integers. If you want Real numbers, then say "0.0 .. 1.0" instead. -- Darren Duncan

`That would be inconsistent. $x ~~ 0..1 means 0 <= $x <= 1. The fact that`

`the endpoints are integers does not imply the the range does not include`

`non-integer reals.`

`My argument is that iterating a range could be defined to give you a`

`uniform distribution of values that would smart match true against that`

`range -- and that such a definition would be just as reasonable as (and`

`perhaps more general than) one that says that you get an incrementing`

`ordered set of integers across that range.`