Darren Duncan wrote: > Does "..." also come with the 4 variations of endpoint inclusion/exclusion? > > If not, then it should, as I'm sure many times one would want to do this, > say: > > for 0...^$n -> {...}
You can toggle the inclusion/exclusion of the ending condition by choosing between "..." and "...^"; but the starting point is the starting point no matter what: there is neither "^..." nor "^...^". > In any event, I still think that the mnemonics of "..." (yadda-yadda-yadda) > are more appropriate to a generator, where it says "produce this and so on". > A ".." does not have that mnemonic and looks better for an interval. Well put. This++. -- Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang