Is this particular change one that could be implemented
algorithmically, or at least partially so?
(E.g. For all modules
check for the presence of a ":D".
If it's there, no action.
If not, insert a line of code. Run a test.
If successful, post change.
If not, alert a human)
- Re: To :D or not to :D Patrick R. Michaud
- Re: To :D or not to :D Mark Overmeer
- Re: To :D or not to :D Tobias Leich
- Re: To :D or not to :D Moritz Lenz
- Re: To :D or not to :D Mark Overmeer
- Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Richard Hainsworth
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Darren Duncan
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Moritz Lenz
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Mark Overmeer
- Exploit the versioning (was Re: Backwards... Darren Duncan
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Parrot Raiser
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Darren Duncan
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... yary
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Darren Duncan
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Smylers
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Tobias Leich
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Elizabeth Mattijsen
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Mark Overmeer
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Elizabeth Mattijsen
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Moritz Lenz
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Richard Hainsworth
