David Grove wrote:
> since
> Larry did open this up to the perl population at large, this was
> necessarily to be expected. Logically, getting detailed "implementation"
> sections could never have been a serious goal.
I agree.
> I'm told that Eiffel is about
> the truest OOP language in existence, but it has a tiny user base.
But it's NOT because people wouldn't like to program in Eiffel, and
it's not because Eiffel isn't an excellent solution language.
It's because Eiffel is an expensive proprietary product.
--
John Porter
By pressing down a special key It plays a little melody
