David Grove wrote:
> Ok, Visual Basic then.

Really?  Let's see:

> If [Visual Basic] is well-suited to their needs, as they see those
> needs, then [migrating to it from perl] is a good thing. Specifically
> anybody whose needs could be adequately met by [Visual Basic] would
> certainly be seriously dissatisfied with perl, they're as close to
> opposite languages as I can think of, in many ways.

Nope, not quite the same.

John Porter

Reply via email to