On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:38:27PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 02:24 PM 5/27/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> >I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
> >  * perl6-stdlib
> >  * perl6-build
> >Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current form?
> Got me, as I'm not on either set.

I'm the -build culprit.  Let it live: once we have code it
will become alive.

> >It looks like the perl6-internals-api-{embed,parser,syntax-tree} lists
> >represent too much fragmentation, and that the perl6-internals list is
> >where that discussion will take place.  Dan?
> Yeah, those can go. One of those "Seemed like a good idea at the time" things.
> >We'd need Chip's okay to close the Topaz list.  I don't know what he
> >would like to do with it.
> Is Chip back from Saturn, then? :)

Last I heard he was in Earth orbit (but behind Moon).

> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
>                                       teddy bears get drunk

$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Reply via email to