Darren Duncan skribis 2006-05-28 14:37 (-0700): > For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be > able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' "use perl5:Foo" > syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wiki > solution using the NEW technology.
I'm assuming re-using code is okay, as long as it's pre-existing. It would be a good idea to create Perl 6 wrappers around them, so that once a Perl 6 implementation is good enough for doing it in Perl 6, code can be migrated easily. > Therefore, if this Wiki is going to be made sooner rather than later, > what are we going to use for a storage engine? Well, since storage needs support for revisions, I'm all for re-using open source industry standards like svk or svn. Initially, the command line tools can be wrapped around. Later, native support can be built. Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
