>>>>> "Fagyal" == Fagyal Csongor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fagyal> As a side note I also have to add that I really dislike the Fagyal> "html-functions" CGI.pm currently has. Creating the representation is Fagyal> the task of the designer, not the programmer. It's almost like "echo" Fagyal> in PHP :))) I used CGI.pm with simple cgi scripts, with Apache::ASP, Fagyal> mod_perl and FCGI, I used CGI::Cookie, etc. yet I never needed those Fagyal> HTML generating methods. To me, <imho>it feels wrong that they are Fagyal> there</imho>. You've never made a sticky form then. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
