Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-21 15:24 (-0700):
> : > That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @.  (This is
> : > currently b0rken in pugs though.)  Likewise .{} is equivalen to %.
> : Nice, but what's the syntax for an empty slice then?
> Oh, I expect .[()] would work for that.  Why you'd want one beats me.

Generated code. It's nice that Perl usually isn't picky about such
things, because it saves you a lot of special cases when you're
generating code.
korajn salutojn,

  juerd waalboer:  perl hacker  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <>
  convolution:     ict solutions and consultancy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to