On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:14:13 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> If you argue that most people want an implemenation that covers large
> parts of the specs, the most logical step would be to boost pugs
> development. It's the most advanced implementation by far.
> And I do believe that it can be sped up if you really want that.
> So where's that pro parrot bias coming from?


besides the speed/performance, one should also consider the (intended)
portability of Parrot here. As you may know, a goal of Parrot is to run
on _all_ the platforms Perl ever ran. GHC and its Haskell runtime is not
as ubiquitous as a 'working' C compiler.

Best regards,


Reply via email to