On 12/11/2013 08:10, Tony Rutkowski wrote: ... > What if one believes that mitigation is not > appropriate, or that it pervasive monitoring > should be enhanced?
Hi Tony, In the IETF we try to focus our lists on precise objectives. I didn't see you in Vancouver but I assume you watched the plenary (if not, it's available at www.ietf.org/live). Despite a few complaints about details of the way the hums at the end were phrased, the sense of the room was pretty clear: the plenary felt that pervasive surveillance is a technical attack and our technical specifications should defend against it. I take the proposed revised charter for this list as embodying that sense and describing a triage process for concrete technical proposals to achieve it. That seems appropriate to me. Brian _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
