> Discussion is limited to specific technical proposals for > improvements in IETF protocols and to IETF process changes > aiming to increase the liklihood that implementation and > deployment of IETF protocols results in better mitigation > for pervasive monitoring.
Wording issue: "mitigation" is "the action of reducing the severity, seriousness, or painfulness". It would be best to (optionally) make it possible to block pervasive monitoring completely. Perhaps change "mitigation for" to something like "potential resistance to"?
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
