sorry I'm perhaps too late ... but I would have suggested that instead of better mitigation for pervasive monitoring
we use better mitigation of pervasive monitoring i.e. mitigation of damages -- instead of mitigation for damages *http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Mitigation <http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Mitigation>*or better pervasive monitoring mitigation. I guess Tony will correct me. p. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>wrote: > > The new list description is up now. [1] Thanks for > not turning that into an endless debate! > > I'd like to also thank Paul Wouters and Dave Crocker > for volunteering to do list moderation, so please heed > what they say if they need to put on that hat here > in future. Sean and I will still be listed as > moderators for a bit, but we'll be depending on Paul > and Dave to handle any issues that arise from now on. > > Cheers and thanks again to Dave and Paul, > S. > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
