Hi Steve, On 11/13/2013 02:34 PM, Stephen Kent wrote: > Stephen, > > I agree that mitigation is the preferred term. > > I am not so comfortable with using this list to incrementally develop > new proposals via e-mail exchanges, instead of requiring proposals to be > prepared as I-Ds. There are enough folks on the list with IETF I-D prep > experience to assist anyone who needs help. > > The rigor of writing a document usually helps refine one's ideas > (and spares others from half-baked notions :-) ).
I agree, which is why I included this bit: "Those with proposals are encouraged to embody them in detailed internet-draft specifications, rather than relying solely on email messages." I'm quite happy to make that a bit stronger if someone has words to offer, but we also don't want to push away all mail discussion of course - I think it should be fine if there's an initial discussion on a topic to see if its worth pursuing, so long as that's fairly quickly turned into an I-D and we don't get the "design via email exchanges" thing taking up everyone's cycles. S. > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
