Richard Forth wrote:
> Sorry If I caused any offence

No offence taken at all - it gave me the opportunity to raise something
that's been bugging me for a while.

It's a perception that we need to address, that's all (and pretending
that it isn't there or that it isn't sometimes justified isn't a solution).

The idea that OOo will do unless you really need to spend money on
Office, or that the only reason you'd stick Linux on a PC is to avoid
the MS "tax" (often as little as about £20 on mass produced machines),
does nothing to promote FOSS. It's been possible to buy cheap Linux PCs
for ages, almost always as a way to keep the cost down; if there is the
opportunity for buyers to give feedback it'll be littered with "really
good cheap PC, wiped Linux and installed XP no problem". We risk
positioning Linux and FOSS in general as "great if you can't afford MS
stuff" which is ludicrous when you think about it, and there are plenty
of examples of Linux/FOSS being chosen for non-financial reasons
(Apache/PHP/Firefox/etc).

But there are plenty of examples where Linux/FOSS falls short, and where
they exist the only people we can blame is ourselves, so if we can find
a project we can contribute to we should - I think we'd gain a lot from it.

-- 
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0845 45 89 555
Registered in England (0456 0902) at 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG 


_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to