Tony Vroon wrote:
If that's how it is, then I think I should leave this community for good. The other mail was clearly a personal mail to Malcolm and it was already deleted from the archives.
the one I quoted was in *an* archive at the time I sent it and still is - I thought your number had been on the list before in connection with getting into the previous location of LINX (I was wrong) but Google obliged with www.mail-archive.com/peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk/msg02306.html <http://www.mail-archive.com/peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk/msg02306.html>
please don't take umbrage at this, I was merely questioning whether one (or perhaps two) errors that disclosed a mobile phone number were sufficient reason to change the addressing scheme of the list. The other logical arguments for change may win the day though.
To me the one I quoted wasn't "clearly a personal mail" but was a list reply aimed at an individual but part of a public thread, YMMV.
Phil
_______________________________________________ Peterboro mailing list Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
